Difference between revisions of "Talk:PRS Small Bodies Facets"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " == Dust studies. What about gas? == We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate. Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk]") |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate. Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk] | We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate. Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Surfaces, interiors, and atmospheres == | ||
+ | |||
+ | My guess is that studies of surfaces (reflectance, gelogical maps) and interiors (seismology, excavation, models) belong to physical properties, and we may want to add something to that effect before "etc." However, are we OK with atmospheric studies (e.g., of KBOs) being categorized with the atmospheres discipline? [msk] |
Revision as of 16:07, 18 September 2013
Dust studies. What about gas?
We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate. Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk]
Surfaces, interiors, and atmospheres
My guess is that studies of surfaces (reflectance, gelogical maps) and interiors (seismology, excavation, models) belong to physical properties, and we may want to add something to that effect before "etc." However, are we OK with atmospheric studies (e.g., of KBOs) being categorized with the atmospheres discipline? [msk]