This site may be down for up to an hour for network maintenance during the period
21 January 2022 22:30 UTC - 22 January 2022 00:30 UTC.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:PRS Small Bodies Facets"

From The SBN Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " == Dust studies. What about gas? == We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate. Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk]")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate.  Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk]
 
We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate.  Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk]
 +
 +
 +
== Surfaces, interiors, and atmospheres ==
 +
 +
My guess is that studies of surfaces (reflectance, gelogical maps) and interiors (seismology, excavation, models) belong to physical properties, and we may want to add something to that effect before "etc."  However, are we OK with atmospheric studies (e.g., of KBOs) being categorized with the atmospheres discipline? [msk]

Revision as of 16:07, 18 September 2013

Dust studies. What about gas?

We have a facet for dust studies, which is appropriate. Should there be "gas studies" ? [msk]


Surfaces, interiors, and atmospheres

My guess is that studies of surfaces (reflectance, gelogical maps) and interiors (seismology, excavation, models) belong to physical properties, and we may want to add something to that effect before "etc." However, are we OK with atmospheric studies (e.g., of KBOs) being categorized with the atmospheres discipline? [msk]